| HOME |
Research Database -
International Updates
Safety and Regulation
Issue 29
SRINIVASAN and colleagues, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center and
Veterans Affairs, Amarillo 79106-1797 USA write that Kombucha tea is a
health beverage made by incubating the Kombucha "mushroom" in tea and
sugar. They write that although therapeutic benefits have been attributed to the
drink, neither beneficial effects nor adverse side effects have been reported in the
scientific literature. RESULTS: The authors report side effects
probably related to Kombucha tea consumption in four patients, two of whom
presented with allergic reaction symptoms, one with jaundice and
another with nausea, vomiting and head and neck pain. In all four
patients, Kombucha tea was consumed just prior to the onset of symptoms, which ceased when
tea drinking stopped. This suggests a probably aetiologic association.
Srinivasan R et al. Probably gastrointestinal toxicity of
Kombucha tea: is this beverage healthy or harmful? J Gen Intern Med. 12(10):
643-6. Oct 1997.
ISRAEL and YOUNGKIN, St David's Medical Center,
Austin Texas 78765-4039 USA write that consumer use of alternative medicines in
the United States is growing rapidly, including herbal therapies as adjunct or alternative
for perimenopausal and menopausal complaints. The authors review (74 references)
and write of their significant concern regarding the safety of these herbs.
As many women are using herbal therapies, clinicians must be knowledgeable regarding their
use, quality and safety. They state that there are presently no government
standards regarding the quality of herbal products in the United States, and that some
products are either unsafe or that little is known of them scientifically. The
authors examine selected herbal therapies touted in the lay press for common
perimenopausal and menopausal complaints and offer advice regarding their use and safety
based upon scientific sources.
Israel D and Youngkin EQ. Herbal therapies for perimenopausal
and menopausal complaints. Pharmacotherapy 17(5): 970-84.
Sep-Oct 1997.
BENZI and CECI, European Agency for the Evaluation of
Medicinal Products (EMEA), London UK write that herbal medicines are now assuming
large utilisation within primary healthcare of individuals and communities along
with the growing interest in traditional and alternative medicine systems in many
developing nations. While consumer surveys indicate a positive public attitude toward
complementary medicine, the regulation of herbal medicines is largely variable
dependent upon ethnological, medical and historical background within each country. WHO
Guidelines for the Assessment of Herbal Remedies, adopted by the International Conference
of Drug Regulatory Authorities (Ottawa, October 1991), have within them the basic
legislative elements for registration procedures for herbal medicines. WHO suggested that
different States ought to: attribute correct importance regarding utilisation of
traditional medicine systems perform a systematic inventory and assessment of medical
plants used by traditional practitioners and peoples and to intensify activities
to facilitate cooperation between providers of traditional and modern medicine,
particularly regarding the use of scientifically proven, safe and effective traditional
remedies. The goal is to facilitate the scientific evaluation and eventual integration of
traditional medicine into the national healthcare system, which will assist an eventual
rational use of traditional medicine through the development of technical guidelines and
international standards.
Benzi G and Ceci A. Herbal medicines in European regulation. Pharmacol
Res. 35(5): 355-62. May 1997.
COMMENTS: I sincerely hope that traditional herbal medicines are 1)
saved from scavenging commercial concerns 2) saved from extinction from rapacious
developers and 3) actually integrated into mainstream medicine. Considering the trends
happening today, these goals appear to be ridiculously utopian. How best to hide them away
somewhere safe? Any suggestions?
|