Research: EGGER and colleagues, Sch

Listed in Issue 55

Abstract

EGGER and colleagues, School of Health Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. eggergj@ozemail.com.au  review the evidence (69 references) regarding the effectiveness of non-prescription weight loss supplements.

Background

Methodology

The authors conducted a detailed literature search including all relevant medical and supplementary databases and evidence from manufacturers. The authors considered the theoretical basis and rationale regarding each substance, as well as available research regarding its efficacy and potential risks. The level of evidence was classified according to the main research studies for each substance.

Results

There was no good evidence for weight loss benefits from most of the substances reviewed by the authors; however there was evidence supporting mild effects of capsaicin, caffeine and fibre, but only in whole foods. In certain cases, e.g. chitosan there is a plausible theoretical basis for the product, but no supporting proof of effect in humans in the absence of a calorie-controlled diet. Potential synergistic effects of different ingredients cannot be dismissed, but cant be assessed from current data.

Conclusion

There is an absence of good quality research regarding many substances, which means that advertising claims may be misleading.

References

Egger G et al. The effectiveness of popular, non-prescription weight loss supplements. The Medical Journal of Australia 171(11-12): 604-8. 6-20 Dec 1999.

ICAN 2024 Skyscraper

Scientific and Medical Network 2

Cycle Around the World for Charity 2023

Climb Mount Kilimanjaro Charity 2023

top of the page