Positive Health Online

Abstract

JOOS, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Medical Hospital Heidelberg, Vosstrasse 2, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. stefanie.joos@med.uni-heidelberg.de assessed the evidence of the use and efficacy for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Background

Methodology

A systematic literature search in MEDLINE was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Moreover, a selective literature search for health services research studies on the use of CAM in patients with IBD was performed.

Results

Health services research studies showed a high use of CAM in adult and paediatric patients with IBD worldwide. In contrast to the high use among IBD patients, there was a lack of high-quality data for many of the used CAM methods. Although most of the studies showed positive results, the methodological quality of most studies was rather low; therefore, the results had to be interpreted with caution. While there were many studies for probiotics and fish oil, RCTs for the highly used method homeopathy, for most herbal products, and for traditional Chinese medicine methods apart from acupuncture RCTs were completely lacking.

Conclusion

The lack of high-quality studies might be the consequence of the problems: associated with the funding of clinical trials involving CAM. However, having the high user rates in mind, high-quality studies assessing efficacy and safety of those methods are urgently needed. Furthermore, there is a quality need for better representation of CAM in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education.

References

Joos S. Review on efficacy and health services research studies of complementary and alternative medicine in inflammatory bowel disease. [Review] Source Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine. 17(6): 403-9. Jun 2011.