Positive Health Online

Abstract

KELNER and colleagues, Institute for Human Development, Life Course and Aging, University of Toronto, ON, Canada, have found that complementary and alternative therapists contemplate the need for research into effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness.

Background

The aim of this study was to examine the views of different groups of CAM practitioners on the need to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of their work.

Methodology

Qualitative interviews were conducted with 22 representatives of three CAM professions (Chiropractic, Homeopathy, Reiki). Qualitative content analysis was used to identify the similarities and differences among and across groups.

Results

Chiropractors agreed that it was essential for their work to provide scientific evidence that their interventions work, are safe and cost-effective. Homeopaths were divided on the question, and Reiki practitioners showed no interest in undertaking such research.

Conclusion

CAM practitioners that are more formally organized are more likely to recognize the importance of scientific research regarding their therapies.

References

Kelner MJ, Boon H, Wellman B, Welsh S. Complementary and alternative groups contemplate the need for effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness research. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 10 (4): 235-239, Dec 2002.

Comment

It seems a bit rash to ascribe these differences to the degree of professional organization.