Positive Health Online

Abstract

PERRY and DOWRICK, Department of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, UK write that General practitioners (GPs) in more affluent areas of the UK have shown considerable interest in the use of complementary medicine. The authors investigated the use of and attitudes towards homoeopathy among GPs working in a socio-economically deprived urban area such as Liverpool.

Background

Methodology

The authors carried out a postal questionnaire survey of all GP practices in Liverpool, including a reminder after 3 weeks. GPs were asked whether they treat with, refer to or endorse 3 common complementary therapies. GPs views were asked regarding NHS funding, effectiveness, adverse reactions, training needs and theoretical validity for each therapy.

Results

The response rate was 131/252 (52%), and was higher among women and doctors aged under 40. During the previous week, 37 (28%) of GPs had been involved in homoeopathy with their patients: 6.5% had treated directly, 18.5% had referred to, and 7% had endorsed homoeopathy. 31% of GPs reported successful outcomes by homoeopath treatment, compared with 14% reporting adverse effects. GPs were generally uncertain regarding the validity of the theoretical basis of homoeopathy; only 23% considered it to have a valid basis.

Conclusion

References

Perry R and Dowrick C. Homeopathy and general practice: an urban perspective. The British Homoeopathic Journal 89(1): 13-6. Jan 2000.